Thursday, January 22, 2026

Origen's Use of Ammonius in the Commentary on John [Part Four]

WorkPassageGreek textual indicators of Ammonian-style pericope useStrength as witness for Ammonius pericope useRank (1–10)
Origen, Commentarium in Ioannem10.30.191–10.31.202 (methodological alignment of Entry / colt / cleansing pericopes)Origen explicitly defers fuller treatment to Matthew (“εὐκαιρότερον… ὅταν εἰς τὸ κατὰ Ματθαῖον ἡμῖν λέγειν δοθῇ”), while nevertheless aligning Mark and Luke as parallel witnesses for the same colt-pericope (“πῶλον δεδεμένον, ἐφ’ ὃν οὐδεὶς πω ἀνθρώπων ἐκάθισεν”). He then tracks how each evangelist contributes distinct elements (Mark: πρὸς θύραν ἔξω ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀμφόδου; Luke: κύριοι τοῦ πώλου; Matthew: entry + cleansing sequence; John: palm-branches and μοναδική χρονική διάταξις), while insisting that apparent discontinuities and narrative interruptions are resolvable only if one respects pericope-level correspondence and sequence. This is explicit procedural control: Origen signals when a pericope belongs properly to another gospel’s treatment and restricts himself accordingly.Extremely strong evidence of conscious pericope partitioning and cross-gospel indexing: Origen not only aligns parallel units but explicitly postpones fuller exposition until the appropriate gospel context—behavior that presupposes a stable, table-like pericope framework.9/10
Origen, Commentarium in Ioannem10.30.194–10.31.200 (bound colt / entry / temple cleansing harmonization)Origen coordinates Mark, Luke, Matthew, and John within clearly delimited pericopes, dissolving ἐναλλαγαί and διαφωνίαι by ἀναγωγή while maintaining unit boundaries and Johannine sequence.Very strong, near-explicit Ammonian harmonization logic.9/10
Origen, Commentarium in Ioannem10.32.205–10.33.212 (Entry into Jerusalem / colt / temple finding)Johannine pericope sequence is followed, with Mark cited as a parallel witness inside a bounded unit, then forward movement resumed.Strong evidence of pericope-by-pericope navigation.8/10
Origen, Commentarium in Ioannem10.37.250–10.38.255 (Temple saying / false witnesses)John 2:19–22 functions as the controlling pericope, with Matthew, Mark, and Luke explicitly aligned as equivalent witnesses (“τὴν ἀναφορὰν ἔχοντα ἐπὶ τὸ αὐτὸ ῥητόν”).Explicit, high-grade evidence of Ammonian-style pericope equivalence across all four gospels.9/10


Email stephan.h.huller@gmail.com with comments or questions.


 
Stephan Huller's Observations by Stephan Huller
is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.