| Work | Passage | Greek textual indicators of Ammonian-style pericope use | Strength as witness for Ammonius pericope use | Rank (1–10) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Origen, Commentarium in Ioannem | 10.30.191–10.31.202 (methodological alignment of Entry / colt / cleansing pericopes) | Origen explicitly defers fuller treatment to Matthew (“εὐκαιρότερον… ὅταν εἰς τὸ κατὰ Ματθαῖον ἡμῖν λέγειν δοθῇ”), while nevertheless aligning Mark and Luke as parallel witnesses for the same colt-pericope (“πῶλον δεδεμένον, ἐφ’ ὃν οὐδεὶς πω ἀνθρώπων ἐκάθισεν”). He then tracks how each evangelist contributes distinct elements (Mark: πρὸς θύραν ἔξω ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀμφόδου; Luke: κύριοι τοῦ πώλου; Matthew: entry + cleansing sequence; John: palm-branches and μοναδική χρονική διάταξις), while insisting that apparent discontinuities and narrative interruptions are resolvable only if one respects pericope-level correspondence and sequence. This is explicit procedural control: Origen signals when a pericope belongs properly to another gospel’s treatment and restricts himself accordingly. | Extremely strong evidence of conscious pericope partitioning and cross-gospel indexing: Origen not only aligns parallel units but explicitly postpones fuller exposition until the appropriate gospel context—behavior that presupposes a stable, table-like pericope framework. | 9/10 |
| Origen, Commentarium in Ioannem | 10.30.194–10.31.200 (bound colt / entry / temple cleansing harmonization) | Origen coordinates Mark, Luke, Matthew, and John within clearly delimited pericopes, dissolving ἐναλλαγαί and διαφωνίαι by ἀναγωγή while maintaining unit boundaries and Johannine sequence. | Very strong, near-explicit Ammonian harmonization logic. | 9/10 |
| Origen, Commentarium in Ioannem | 10.32.205–10.33.212 (Entry into Jerusalem / colt / temple finding) | Johannine pericope sequence is followed, with Mark cited as a parallel witness inside a bounded unit, then forward movement resumed. | Strong evidence of pericope-by-pericope navigation. | 8/10 |
| Origen, Commentarium in Ioannem | 10.37.250–10.38.255 (Temple saying / false witnesses) | John 2:19–22 functions as the controlling pericope, with Matthew, Mark, and Luke explicitly aligned as equivalent witnesses (“τὴν ἀναφορὰν ἔχοντα ἐπὶ τὸ αὐτὸ ῥητόν”). | Explicit, high-grade evidence of Ammonian-style pericope equivalence across all four gospels. | 9/10 |
Thursday, January 22, 2026
Origen's Use of Ammonius in the Commentary on John [Part Four]
Email stephan.h.huller@gmail.com with comments or questions.