Tuesday, January 20, 2026

Does Origen Commentary on Matthew (10:8 - 11) Signal He is Using Ammonius Vs Clement's Letter to Theodore?

ReferenceGospelAmmonian statusBoundary type
Mt 5:1MatthewAmmonian §24Start and end (single-verse pericope)
Mt 7:6MatthewAmmonian §52Start and end (single-verse pericope)
Mt 3:17MatthewAmmonian §14End of section (Mt 3:16–17)
Mt 7:7MatthewAmmonian §53Start of section (Mt 7:7–11)
Lk 13:6LukeAmmonian §164Start of section (Lk 13:6–13)

Origen never uses boundary-marking language of the kind found in Clement’s Letter to Theodore, where phrases such as μετὰ τὸ… καὶ τὰ ἑξῆς ἕως explicitly mark a controlled span of Gospel text. In Comm. Matt. 10.8–11, Origen neither brackets nor delimits in that way. His citations begin where the Gospel begins because that is how ancient readers cited Scripture aloud and from memory, not because he is indexing sections.

Objectively, then, nothing in these instances themselves requires or even strongly suggests the use of an Ammonian apparatus. What they show is compatibility, not evidence of use.



Email stephan.h.huller@gmail.com with comments or questions.


 
Stephan Huller's Observations by Stephan Huller
is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.