Sunday, February 15, 2026

Disagreements Between Tertullian's and Epiphanius's Citation of Marcionite Readings/Pericopes

 

Greek reading reported by EpiphaniusCanonical Luke referenceEpiphanius claim about Marcionite textTertullian evidenceDisagreement
«ἵνα ᾖ μαρτύριον τοῦτο ὑμῖν … εἰς μαρτύριον αὐτοῖς»Luke 5:14variant wordingAdv. Marc. 4.9.9-10 assumes canonical phrasingYES — Epiphanius preserves variant absent from Tertullian
«ἵνα δὲ εἰδῆτε ὅτι ἐξουσίαν ἔχει…»Luke 5:24presentTertullian uses normallyNO
«Κύριός ἐστιν ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου καὶ τοῦ σαββάτου»Luke 6:5presentAdv. Marc. 4.12.5NO
«Ἰούδαν Ἰσκαριώτην…»Luke 6:16wording detailnot discussedUNCLEAR
«κατέβη ἐν αὐτοῖς» vs «μετ’ αὐτῶν»Luke 6:17explicit Greek variantno Latin traceYES — textual form diverges
«πᾶς ὁ ὄχλος ἐζήτει ἅπτεσθαι…»Luke 6:19-20presentTertullian not concerned with wordingUNCLEAR
«Κατὰ τὰ αὐτὰ ἐποίουν τοῖς προφήταις…»Luke 6:23presentprophetic continuity used differentlyPOSSIBLE
«τοσαύτην πίστιν…»Luke 7:9presentAdv. Marc. 4.18.1NO
«μακάριος ὃς οὐ μὴ σκανδαλισθῇ…» alteredLuke 7:23contextual alterationTertullian silentYES — Epiphanius reports redaction unknown to Tertullian
«ἰδοὺ ἀποστέλλω τὸν ἄγγελόν μου…»Luke 7:27presentAdv. Marc. 4.18.7NO
sinful woman wordingLuke 7:36-38textual detailTertullian ignores wordingUNCLEAR
omission of «ἡ μήτηρ αὐτοῦ…»Luke 8:19-20omission claimedTertullian presumes normal family referenceYES — structural contradiction
«ἐπετίμησε τῷ ἀνέμῳ…»Luke 8:23-24presentused by TertullianNO
hemorrhage narrative wordingLuke 8:42-46variant linesAdv. Marc. 4.20.7-8 uses episode canonicallyYES — variant not reflected
Transfiguration voiceLuke 9:35presentAdv. Marc. 4.22.1NO
Jonah/Nineveh omissionLuke 11:29-32material removedTertullian assumes prophetic fulfilment logicYES — ideological conflict
«παρέρχεσθε τὴν κλῆσιν» vs κρίσινLuke 11:42wording variantAdv. Marc. 4.27.4 cites canonical formYES
Wisdom saying removedLuke 11:49-51omission claimedTertullian’s prophetic argument presupposes fuller traditionYES
confession wording alteredLuke 12:8variant reportedAdv. Marc. 4.28.4 presumes canonicalYES
«Ζητεῖτε τὴν βασιλείαν…»Luke 12:31presentAdv. Marc. 4.29.5NO
patriarch banquet cutLuke 13:28omission claimedTertullian stresses patriarch continuity elsewhereYES — theological contradiction
rich man & LazarusLuke 16presentAdv. Marc. 4.34.10NO
ten lepers modifiedLuke 17altered narrativeAdv. Marc. 4.35 uses canonical OT continuityPOSSIBLE
rich ruler wording variantLuke 18variant speech formsAdv. Marc. 4.36.4POSSIBLE
donkey/temple narrative cutLuke 19omission claimedTertullian presupposes temple fulfilment themesYES — structural divergence
resurrection bush proof removedLuke 20:37-38omission claimedTertullian relies on resurrection scriptural proofsYES — major theological conflict
passion predictions removedLuke 18:31-33omission claimedTertullian assumes suffering prophecyYES
«σήμερον μετ’ ἐμοῦ…» absentLuke 23:43omission claimedTertullian unclearUNCLEAR
Emmaus prophetic wording alteredLuke 24:25-26variantTertullian presupposes prophecy fulfilmentYES — ideological divergence
«πνεῦμα ὀστέα οὐκ ἔχει…»Luke 24:38-39presentAdv. Marc. 4.43.6NO


Email stephan.h.huller@gmail.com with comments or questions.


 
Stephan Huller's Observations by Stephan Huller
is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.